RSS Feed
How Volcanism Affects Climate

By Joe D'Aleo
Monday, April 21, 2008

Climatologists may disagree on how much the recent global warming is natural or man-made but there is general agreement that volcanism constitutes a wildcard in climate, producing significant global scale cooling for at least a few years following a major eruption.

 

Volcanic activity is constantly ongoing around the globe with a half-dozen or more volcanoes active at any given moment. Most of these are smaller eruptions, however, and their effects are minor, short lived and confined to the lower atmosphere near the volcano. Major eruptions are much rarer. They can eject both ash and gases like sulfur dioxide high into the atmosphere -- 80,000 feet or more. Although much of the ash may fall out within 6 months to a year, sulfur dioxide quickly gets converted to sulfate aerosols, which can reside for two or more years in the stable high atmosphere. These then block some of the incoming solar radiation. The net result is a global cooling. An average cooling of 0.2 to 0.5C over a 2 to 3 year period can occur for a major eruption (de Silva, Robock, others) and has been documented by both surface and satellite observations after major eruptions like El Chichon (Mexico in 1982) and Pinatubo (Indonesia in 1991).

 

It should be noted that Robock (2003) and others have shown that though major volcanic eruptions seem to have their greatest cooling effect in the summer months, the location of the volcano determines whether the winters are colder or warmer over large parts of North America and Eurasia. According to Robock, tropical region volcanoes like El Chichon and Pinatubo actually produce a warming in winter due to a tendency for a more positive North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) and Arctic Oscillation (AO) (below left). In the positive phase of these large scale pressure oscillations, low pressure and cold air is trapped in high latitudes and the resulting more westerly jet stream winds drives milder maritime air into the continents.

 

Robock found high latitude volcanoes like Katmai (Alaska in 1912,) instead favored the negative phase of the Arctic and North Atlantic Oscillations and cold winters (below right). In the negative phase, the jet stream winds buckled and forced cold air south from Canada into the eastern United States and west from Siberia into Europe. Despite the regional differences in winter, globally on an annual basis, volcanic eruptions lead to a net cooling regardless as to the volcano’s latitude.

Figure 1: AO/NAO phases. The positive (warm) phase has low pressure and cold air in high latitudes with enhanced westerlies and mid-latitude warmth. The negative (cold) phase has high latitude blocking high pressure which forces the cold air south with amplified troughs and ridges

 

Major eruptions are relatively rare events and seem to occur in clusters as the chart (stratospheric aerosol as measured by NASA GISS Aerosol Optical Thickness) below shows. The late 1800s to the early 1900s was a very active period with Krakatoa (Indonesia between Java and Sumatra in 1883) as the major event.  With a quiet sun, it is no surprise this era was very cold. A quiet sun is associated with lower solar irradiance (energy emission) and less heat input into our atmosphere.

 

The 1920s to the 1940s was a period of very little volcanic activity that coincided with a rapid increase in solar irradiance and multi-decadal warming in both oceans with a resulting warming of global temperatures. The sun and oceans are believed to be the primary drivers but lack of volcanic ash may have augmented the warming.

Figure 2: Global stratospheric aerosol loading as estimated by the Aerosol Optical Thickness by Sato of NASA GISS. Notice the tendency for clustering of major eruptional activity in the later 1800s, 1960s and early 1980s and 1990s. Current levels are near or at the low of the entire record.

The 1960s became very active with Mt. Agung as the first of several significant eruptions that kept aerosols levels high much of the decade. This coincided with a quieter sun and cooler cycles in both the Atlantic and Pacific. That decade not surprisingly was the coldest of the last 50 years.

 

After 1979, even as temperatures began again to rise with an increasingly active sun and a warming in the Pacific (called the Great Pacific Climate Shift), cooler global temperatures followed the major eruptions of Mt. St. Helens (Washington State in 1981) and El Chichon (1982) and Pinatubo and Cerro Hudson (Chili in 1991),. This is clearly evident in figure 3 below which relates the stratospheric aerosol loading represented as aerosol optical thickness (Sato et al 1998) to the satellite derived lower tropospheric temperatures (Spencer and Christy 2006).

 

All the warm and cold periods on the satellite derived global temperature graph can be attributed to El Ninos or La Ninas and volcanic eruptions. El Ninos are events characterized by a warming of the east and central tropical Pacific Ocean. The warm water warms the atmosphere and that heat gets carried poleward by atmospheric circulations, resulting in a global rise in temperatures.  La Ninas are characterized by colder than normal waters in the east and central tropical Pacific. They usually induce a global cooling.

 

Indeed most of the warm red spikes in the temperature (top curve) coincide with El Ninos and the cold blue dips from La Ninas.  Volcanic eruptions can override El Nino warming. The volcanic cooling associated with the major eruptions in 1982 and 1991 were able to minimize and then offset the warming with the super El Nino of 1982/83 and the El Ninos of the early 1990s on a global basis.

Figure 3: The Christy Spencer satellite derived lower tropospheric global temperature anomalies since 1979 and the corresponding stratospheric aerosol loading (aerosol optical thickness) as estimated by Sato at NASA GISS. Note the cooling with the major eruptions of the early 1980s and 1990s. Note the warmth in recent years with aerosols at their lowest levels of at least the satellite era. Red arrows depict El Nino years (invariably warm) and blue La Nina (cold). Lack of volcanism may have combined with El Ninos to keep it warm this decade.

LACK OF VOLCANISM CONTRIBUTING TO RECENT WARMTH?

 

As both aerosol graphics show, during the last six years, stratospheric aerosols are at an historic low levels (according to James Hansen's NASA GISS group, the level of stratospheric aerosols is now at the very least at the lowest level since direct satellite measurements began in 1979). A cleaner atmosphere, with much below normal aerosol levels would allow more solar radiation to reach the earth's surface, which along with the warm multi-decadal modes in both Atlantic and Pacific may be driving the current continued warming even as the solar input appears to be starting a decline.

Figure 4: Note during times of high stratospheric aerosols, rather widespread cooling is observed especially in the Polar Regions, eastern Europe and western Asia. During times of low stratospheric aerosol levels, widespread warmth is observed in polar and across most of the Northern Hemispheric continents.

There is support for this in the data for the United States. Using annual USHCN climate data, I found the average annual temperature during years with more than ½ STD below normal aerosols to average a +0.72F while during periods of more than ½ STD above normal a -0.26F.  

 

Recent Support from Lunar Eclipse Studies

Last month’s lunar eclipse not only treated skygazers to a ruddy view of the Moon - it revealed that Earth’s atmosphere contains little light-blocking volcanic dust. Some researchers say the low volcanic dust levels in the atmosphere over the last dozen years could be contributing to global warming, but others dispute the claim. During a lunar eclipse, Earth blocks sunlight from reaching the Moon directly. But some sunlight still gets through, refracted through Earth’s atmosphere. The amount varies, depending mainly on how much dust from volcanic eruptions is floating around at high altitudes. Because dust can block sunlight from passing through the atmosphere, more dust makes for a darker Moon during lunar eclipses. “All the big dimmings of the Moon during eclipses can be attributed to specific volcanoes,” says Richard Keen of the University of Colorado in Boulder, US.

Keen and his collaborators have charted the brightness of eclipses back to 1960 and for a few years around the time of the 1883 eruption of Indonesia’s Krakatoa volcano. The most recent lunar eclipse, on 20-21 February, was a bright one, measuring a 3 - the second-brightest level - on an eclipse-rating scale that ranges from 0 to 4. That is in line with eclipse data taken since 1995. In that time, the stratosphere has been especially clear, with very little haze-producing volcanic activity compared to the previous three decades, from 1965 to 1995, Keen says. Because more sunlight is reaching the surface, Earth should be 0.1 to 0.2° Celsius warmer in recent years than it was back in the late 1960s, Keen and his colleagues calculate.

Susan Solomon of the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in Boulder, Colorado disputes Keen’s conclusions. The amount of haze in the stratosphere has been higher - blocking more sunlight - in the past 40 years compared to the 20 years before that, she says. So over the past 60 years, there would have been a slight cooling trend if volcanic haze were the only influence on climate, she says.

Keen acknowledges that depending on the period chosen, volcanic haze can give a cooling rather than a warming trend. But he argues that the relatively long period with a clear atmosphere since 1995 could be having a big impact on climate, especially if the extra sunshine reaching the Earth’s surface could create subtle, longer-term warming effects through the heating of ocean water, as some scientists propose.

Note: Solomon has been wrong before. She was a lead author of the latest IPCC Summary for Policymakers that greatly overstated the human greenhouse influence on climate. She was a leader in the ozone hole consensus a few decades back that may have collapsed. She is wrong again here. Keen was talking about the period since 1995 in which the volcanic aerosols have been as rock bottom levels not the last 60 years.

Tracking Links:

 

Smithsonian/USGS - Weekly reports (link)

 

UND Volcano World Current Eruptions (link)

 

Volcanic Ash Advisory Centers (link)

 

References:

 

Fleming, J.R., Historical Perspectives on Climate Change, New York Oxford University Press, 1998 PDF file

 

Live Science Story: Scientist: Inject Sulfur into Air to Battle Global Warming (link)

 

Predictions of Climate following Volcanic Eruptions, Matthew Collins, Centre for Global Atmospheric Modeling, Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6BB, UK. PDF file

 

Rampino, M.R., Self, S, Stothers, R.B., Volcanic Winters, Annual Review Earth Planet Sciences, 1988, 16: 73-99  PDF file

 

Robock, Alan, 2003: Volcanoes: Role in climate. in Encyclopedia of Atmospheric Sciences, J. Holton, J. A. Curry, and J. Pyle, Eds., (Academic Press, London), 10.1006/rwas.2002.0169, 2494-2500. (Invited paper) PDF file

 

Sato, M., J.E. Hansen, M.P. McCormick, and J.B. Pollack 1993. Stratospheric aerosol optical depth, 1850-1990. J. Geophys. Res. 98, 22987-22994. Data link.

 

Spencer, R, and Christy, J. 2006 Globally Avergaed Tropospheric Temperatures, University of Alabama at Huntsville GHCC  (link)

 

Volcanic eruptions and their impact on the earth’s climate

Shanaka L. de Silva, Department of Space Studies, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, North Dakota, USA. Encyclopedia of Science (link)

Advertisements